Changing scope re-grounds every widget and the analysis rail.
9 sources live
Permalink
Nepal at a glance
Precomputed. No model runs to draw this page.
Last rebuild 2026-08-09 16:48 UTC · build 6ea742c
Reconciliation spotlightTwo sources, two numbers
Unemployment, total (% of total labor force), NPL, 2008
1.38–10.6%·two sources differ by 9.22 percentage points
Why do these differ?
ILOSTAT's UNE_DEAP_SEX_AGE_RT is the direct labour force survey estimate (total, ages 15+), reported only in the years Nepal ran an NLFS round (1996, 1999, 2003, 2008, 2015, 2017); the World Bank's SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS is a smoothed modelled annual series. The two converge almost exactly in 2017 (verified live: 10.66% both) but ILOSTAT sits far below the Bank's figure before it (1.4-4.5%). That is a real break in Nepal's own survey methodology, not a data error: Nepal's LFS moved from an extended activity definition (which classified most subsistence/unpaid economic activity as employment, pushing measured unemployment very low) to the standard ICLS-19 definition around the 2017/18 NLFS III round.
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), https://uis.unesco.org, extracted 2026-08-09. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 -- adaptations/derived figures must be shared under the same licence.
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), https://uis.unesco.org, extracted 2026-08-09. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 -- adaptations/derived figures must be shared under the same licence.